<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 120 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA AT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757876</link>
    <description>Limitation objections based on the foreign exchange transition saving clause were rejected on the facts, and the continuation of adjudication under the repealed regime was treated as maintainable. Statements and materials from customs, income-tax, and other collateral proceedings were not treated as determinative, but could still be examined independently in FEMA adjudication. On the merits, the Tribunal found that the same machinery was exported and re-imported at materially inflated values, and that the foreign exchange had been used for a purpose different from the one for which it was acquired. The findings of contravention and the penalties were therefore upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2024 08:18:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=766411" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 120 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA AT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757876</link>
      <description>Limitation objections based on the foreign exchange transition saving clause were rejected on the facts, and the continuation of adjudication under the repealed regime was treated as maintainable. Statements and materials from customs, income-tax, and other collateral proceedings were not treated as determinative, but could still be examined independently in FEMA adjudication. On the merits, the Tribunal found that the same machinery was exported and re-imported at materially inflated values, and that the foreign exchange had been used for a purpose different from the one for which it was acquired. The findings of contravention and the penalties were therefore upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757876</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>