<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 112 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757868</link>
    <description>CESTAT Allahabad allowed the appeal regarding statutory interest on refund under Section 35FF of Central Excise Act, 1944. The tribunal held that interest payment on pre-deposit refund is mandatory and automatic, not dependent on assessee&#039;s claim. The adjudicating authority&#039;s failure to grant interest was a legal error that appellate authority must correct. The tribunal relied on precedent establishing that Section 35FF mandates interest payment regardless of whether pre-deposit was made in cash or through Cenvat credit, and irrespective of the Rs.10 crore limit under Section 35F. The impugned order was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2024 08:18:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=766400" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 112 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757868</link>
      <description>CESTAT Allahabad allowed the appeal regarding statutory interest on refund under Section 35FF of Central Excise Act, 1944. The tribunal held that interest payment on pre-deposit refund is mandatory and automatic, not dependent on assessee&#039;s claim. The adjudicating authority&#039;s failure to grant interest was a legal error that appellate authority must correct. The tribunal relied on precedent establishing that Section 35FF mandates interest payment regardless of whether pre-deposit was made in cash or through Cenvat credit, and irrespective of the Rs.10 crore limit under Section 35F. The impugned order was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757868</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>