<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>ITC AVAILABLE ON LIFT INSTALLED IN COMMERCIAL BUILDING GIVEN FOR RENT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=119285</link>
    <description>The central issue is whether ITC on GST paid for a lift installed in a rented commercial building is blocked as part of immovable property or is allowable because the lift qualifies as plant or machinery or a separately identifiable asset used to make outward supplies. Opinions diverge: some authorities and rulings treat lifts as integral to the building and deny credit; others rely on statutory definition, accounting treatment, contractual terms and the functionality of the asset to support ITC. Recent Supreme Court guidance applying a functionality test may expand circumstances in which ITC can be sustained, but entitlement remains fact-sensitive and advisedly supported by documentation and specialist advice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2024 16:43:33 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2025 10:40:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=766355" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>ITC AVAILABLE ON LIFT INSTALLED IN COMMERCIAL BUILDING GIVEN FOR RENT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=119285</link>
      <description>The central issue is whether ITC on GST paid for a lift installed in a rented commercial building is blocked as part of immovable property or is allowable because the lift qualifies as plant or machinery or a separately identifiable asset used to make outward supplies. Opinions diverge: some authorities and rulings treat lifts as integral to the building and deny credit; others rely on statutory definition, accounting treatment, contractual terms and the functionality of the asset to support ITC. Recent Supreme Court guidance applying a functionality test may expand circumstances in which ITC can be sustained, but entitlement remains fact-sensitive and advisedly supported by documentation and specialist advice.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2024 16:43:33 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=119285</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>