<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 880 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457046</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the Tax Appeal, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decisions. The Tribunal remanded the re-computation of interest to the AO. It upheld the allowance of expenditure under Section 35D and the deletion of disallowance on depreciation for certain assets, emphasizing consistency. The Tribunal also allowed depreciation on leased assets, directing the AO to comply, based on established practices.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2024 15:47:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=766354" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 880 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457046</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the Tax Appeal, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decisions. The Tribunal remanded the re-computation of interest to the AO. It upheld the allowance of expenditure under Section 35D and the deletion of disallowance on depreciation for certain assets, emphasizing consistency. The Tribunal also allowed depreciation on leased assets, directing the AO to comply, based on established practices.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457046</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>