https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38089 Review under the Code of Civil Procedure is confined to an error apparent or other mistake existing when the judgment was delivered, so a later Supreme Court decision does not by itself justify review. The power to correct accidental slips or omissions is distinct and was not engaged here because the relief sought went beyond that limited correction. The application was also belated, with no sufficient explanation for the delay after the later decision became known, so the review application was held not maintainable and rejected. en-us Fri, 21 Jan 1977 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 03 Apr 2010 11:11:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38089 Review under the Code of Civil Procedure is confined to an error apparent or other mistake existing when the judgment was delivered, so a later Supreme Court decision does not by itself justify review. The power to correct accidental slips or omissions is distinct and was not engaged here because the relief sought went beyond that limited correction. The application was also belated, with no sufficient explanation for the delay after the later decision became known, so the review application was held not maintainable and rejected. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 21 Jan 1977 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38089