<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 97 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757853</link>
    <description>HC ruled on a tax credit dispute involving CGST/WBGST Act, 2017. The court granted interim relief to the petitioner challenging an adjudication order, allowing potential Input Tax Credit benefits pending the Finance Bill&#039;s passage. An interim order was issued restraining coercive actions, with a directive for a partial deposit of Rs. 25 lakhs and protection until September 2024.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 May 2025 21:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=766320" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 97 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757853</link>
      <description>HC ruled on a tax credit dispute involving CGST/WBGST Act, 2017. The court granted interim relief to the petitioner challenging an adjudication order, allowing potential Input Tax Credit benefits pending the Finance Bill&#039;s passage. An interim order was issued restraining coercive actions, with a directive for a partial deposit of Rs. 25 lakhs and protection until September 2024.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757853</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>