<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 96 - SC Order (LB)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757852</link>
    <description>Suitability of premises offered for office lease by the Income Tax Department was assessed on the technical bid as well as by inspection by the Building Hiring Committee. The Court found no merit in the challenge to the declaration that the bidder was not qualified, noting that the evaluation was not confined to the written bid alone. The Special Leave Petition under Article 136 was not entertained and was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2024 14:46:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=766319" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 96 - SC Order (LB)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757852</link>
      <description>Suitability of premises offered for office lease by the Income Tax Department was assessed on the technical bid as well as by inspection by the Building Hiring Committee. The Court found no merit in the challenge to the declaration that the bidder was not qualified, noting that the evaluation was not confined to the written bid alone. The Special Leave Petition under Article 136 was not entertained and was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757852</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>