<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 87 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757843</link>
    <description>ITAT Chennai set aside PCIT&#039;s revision order under section 263 regarding disallowance under section 14A. The tribunal held that AO had properly examined the issue during original assessment proceedings and made no disallowance as assessee received no dividend exempt income. PCIT&#039;s reliance on Explanation to section 14A inserted by Finance Act 2022 was misplaced since assessment year 2017-18 predated the amendment. Following Delhi HC precedent in Era Infrastructure case, tribunal ruled assessment must be made per law existing at relevant time. PCIT&#039;s exercise of revisional jurisdiction was unjustified and assessee&#039;s grounds were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2024 08:27:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=766303" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 87 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757843</link>
      <description>ITAT Chennai set aside PCIT&#039;s revision order under section 263 regarding disallowance under section 14A. The tribunal held that AO had properly examined the issue during original assessment proceedings and made no disallowance as assessee received no dividend exempt income. PCIT&#039;s reliance on Explanation to section 14A inserted by Finance Act 2022 was misplaced since assessment year 2017-18 predated the amendment. Following Delhi HC precedent in Era Infrastructure case, tribunal ruled assessment must be made per law existing at relevant time. PCIT&#039;s exercise of revisional jurisdiction was unjustified and assessee&#039;s grounds were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757843</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>