<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 79 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757835</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the CIT(A) to condone delays in filing appeals against penalties under sections 271B and 271AAC(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, attributed to negligence and unsatisfactory reasons. Both appeals were allowed for statistical purposes, with instructions to decide on merit after hearing the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2024 09:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=766290" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 79 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757835</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the CIT(A) to condone delays in filing appeals against penalties under sections 271B and 271AAC(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, attributed to negligence and unsatisfactory reasons. Both appeals were allowed for statistical purposes, with instructions to decide on merit after hearing the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757835</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>