https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757832 The High Court ruled in favor of the appellant, emphasizing that CESTAT's findings lacked merit in the charges against the appellant. Consequently, the question of vicarious liability was dismissed. The court set aside the reduced penalty imposed by CESTAT, thus disposing of the appeal in favor of the appellant, restoring their customs broker license and security deposit. en-us Wed, 28 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 Sep 2024 08:26:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757832 The High Court ruled in favor of the appellant, emphasizing that CESTAT's findings lacked merit in the charges against the appellant. Consequently, the question of vicarious liability was dismissed. The court set aside the reduced penalty imposed by CESTAT, thus disposing of the appeal in favor of the appellant, restoring their customs broker license and security deposit. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 28 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757832