https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757831 The Bombay HC directed customs authorities to consider the petitioner's application for IGM amendment due to consignee change, following procedures in Customs Circular No. 14/2017-Customs dated 11th April 2017. Relying on precedent from ETG AGRI INDIA case, the court ordered authorities to decide the amendment application subject to petitioner executing an indemnity bond protecting authorities from third-party claims regarding the goods. The petition was disposed of with this direction. en-us Fri, 23 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 Feb 2026 17:21:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757831 The Bombay HC directed customs authorities to consider the petitioner's application for IGM amendment due to consignee change, following procedures in Customs Circular No. 14/2017-Customs dated 11th April 2017. Relying on precedent from ETG AGRI INDIA case, the court ordered authorities to decide the amendment application subject to petitioner executing an indemnity bond protecting authorities from third-party claims regarding the goods. The petition was disposed of with this direction. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 23 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757831