https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757828 Karnataka HC set aside government communication dated 6.4.2015 regarding SEZ power plant operations. The court found the directive requiring re-demarcation of processing areas to non-processing areas for captive power plants was arbitrary and repugnant to accompanying guidelines. Following Delhi HC precedent in Moser Baer India Ltd case, the court held that denying operation and maintenance benefits under Section 26 of SEZ Act for the period 01.04.2015 to 08.05.2016 was invalid. The impugned order was set aside and petition allowed. en-us Wed, 24 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 02 Sep 2024 11:05:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757828 Karnataka HC set aside government communication dated 6.4.2015 regarding SEZ power plant operations. The court found the directive requiring re-demarcation of processing areas to non-processing areas for captive power plants was arbitrary and repugnant to accompanying guidelines. Following Delhi HC precedent in Moser Baer India Ltd case, the court held that denying operation and maintenance benefits under Section 26 of SEZ Act for the period 01.04.2015 to 08.05.2016 was invalid. The impugned order was set aside and petition allowed. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 24 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757828