<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 68 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA AT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757824</link>
    <description>Participation in adjudication through counsel, supply of relied-upon documents, and opportunities for hearing and cross-examination were treated as sufficient compliance with natural justice, so the challenge to service and procedure failed. On the confiscation issue, the record of bank material, witness statements, and overseas tax enquiry reports was said to show that the foreign exchange stood in the appellant&#039;s name only as a name lender and was directly involved in the contravention. The commentary also states that foreign exchange adjudication is independent of criminal prosecution and tax findings, so discharge and income-tax conclusions did not bind the confiscation proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2024 12:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=766268" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 68 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA AT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757824</link>
      <description>Participation in adjudication through counsel, supply of relied-upon documents, and opportunities for hearing and cross-examination were treated as sufficient compliance with natural justice, so the challenge to service and procedure failed. On the confiscation issue, the record of bank material, witness statements, and overseas tax enquiry reports was said to show that the foreign exchange stood in the appellant&#039;s name only as a name lender and was directly involved in the contravention. The commentary also states that foreign exchange adjudication is independent of criminal prosecution and tax findings, so discharge and income-tax conclusions did not bind the confiscation proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757824</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>