https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757820 The Karnataka HC disposed of writ petitions challenging service tax show-cause notices and demand orders under Finance Act, 1994. Upon court's suggestion, Additional Solicitor General agreed to constitute a competent officer team to decide cases within three months, considering territorial jurisdiction. The officers must examine whether petitioners qualify under Section 65B(44), if services fall under negative/exemption lists, liability under Rule 2(1)(d), and limitation bar per Apex Court precedent. All pending writ petitions challenging show-cause notices were relegated to these designated officers for disposal. en-us Wed, 03 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 Sep 2024 08:26:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757820 The Karnataka HC disposed of writ petitions challenging service tax show-cause notices and demand orders under Finance Act, 1994. Upon court's suggestion, Additional Solicitor General agreed to constitute a competent officer team to decide cases within three months, considering territorial jurisdiction. The officers must examine whether petitioners qualify under Section 65B(44), if services fall under negative/exemption lists, liability under Rule 2(1)(d), and limitation bar per Apex Court precedent. All pending writ petitions challenging show-cause notices were relegated to these designated officers for disposal. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 03 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757820