https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457030 A works contract dispute containing an arbitration clause was held to fall under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, rather than the Madhya Pradesh Madhyastham Adhikaran Adhiniyam, 1983. The Court applied harmonious construction and held that the 1983 enactment operated only where no arbitration clause existed; to the extent it conflicted with the later arbitration regime, it stood impliedly repealed. The Section 9 application was therefore maintainable, and the refusal to entertain it was set aside. en-us Thu, 14 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 02 Sep 2024 10:38:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457030 A works contract dispute containing an arbitration clause was held to fall under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, rather than the Madhya Pradesh Madhyastham Adhikaran Adhiniyam, 1983. The Court applied harmonious construction and held that the 1983 enactment operated only where no arbitration clause existed; to the extent it conflicted with the later arbitration regime, it stood impliedly repealed. The Section 9 application was therefore maintainable, and the refusal to entertain it was set aside. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 14 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457030