<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 1462 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457027</link>
    <description>The delay in filing the first appeal was attributable to the Covid-19 pandemic period, which was treated as excluded for limitation purposes in light of Supreme Court directions extending limitation. On that basis, refusal to condone the 727-day delay was not sustained, and the appeal was directed to be heard on merits. The matter was restored to the first appellate authority for fresh adjudication in the interests of justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2024 08:27:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=766213" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 1462 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457027</link>
      <description>The delay in filing the first appeal was attributable to the Covid-19 pandemic period, which was treated as excluded for limitation purposes in light of Supreme Court directions extending limitation. On that basis, refusal to condone the 727-day delay was not sustained, and the appeal was directed to be heard on merits. The matter was restored to the first appellate authority for fresh adjudication in the interests of justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457027</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>