<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 54 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757810</link>
    <description>HC analyzed a tax audit challenge involving CGST Act Section 65(4). The court found audit memos exceeded statutory time limits but did not invalidate the Show Cause Notice. While rejecting immediate quashing of proceedings, HC directed the adjudicating authority to review petitioner&#039;s response within three weeks and make an appropriate decision, preserving both parties&#039; rights.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 May 2025 21:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=766209" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 54 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757810</link>
      <description>HC analyzed a tax audit challenge involving CGST Act Section 65(4). The court found audit memos exceeded statutory time limits but did not invalidate the Show Cause Notice. While rejecting immediate quashing of proceedings, HC directed the adjudicating authority to review petitioner&#039;s response within three weeks and make an appropriate decision, preserving both parties&#039; rights.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757810</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>