<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 31 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757787</link>
    <description>Section 263 revision in reassessment proceedings concerns de novo enquiry and the assessee&#039;s burden to prove identity, creditworthiness and genuineness of transactions; appellate scrutiny of the Tribunal&#039;s factual findings was also treated as raising a substantial question of law. In the recorded outcome, the Revenue&#039;s appeal under section 260A was dismissed, the Tribunal&#039;s order setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s section 263 direction for AY 2012-13 was sustained, and the connected stay application was closed. The special leave petition was then dismissed for delay, as no justifiable grounds were shown for condoning 530 days.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 14:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=766176" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 31 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757787</link>
      <description>Section 263 revision in reassessment proceedings concerns de novo enquiry and the assessee&#039;s burden to prove identity, creditworthiness and genuineness of transactions; appellate scrutiny of the Tribunal&#039;s factual findings was also treated as raising a substantial question of law. In the recorded outcome, the Revenue&#039;s appeal under section 260A was dismissed, the Tribunal&#039;s order setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s section 263 direction for AY 2012-13 was sustained, and the connected stay application was closed. The special leave petition was then dismissed for delay, as no justifiable grounds were shown for condoning 530 days.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757787</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>