<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 29 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757785</link>
    <description>The SC dismissed the special leave petitions due to an inordinate delay of 469 and 465 days in filing, alongside dismissal on merits. The petitions were deemed untimely and substantively insufficient, leading to the conclusion that no grounds existed for granting the relief sought. The petitions were conclusively rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 14:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=766174" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 29 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757785</link>
      <description>The SC dismissed the special leave petitions due to an inordinate delay of 469 and 465 days in filing, alongside dismissal on merits. The petitions were deemed untimely and substantively insufficient, leading to the conclusion that no grounds existed for granting the relief sought. The petitions were conclusively rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757785</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>