<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (2) TMI 71 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38071</link>
    <description>Dividend is taxable only when it is actually or deemed to be paid, credited, or distributed in an unconditional form under section 16(2) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922; a mere declaration subject to remittance restrictions does not create taxable income where the shareholder has no unconditional right to the amount. On that basis, inclusion of the disputed dividend in income was treated as without jurisdiction. A recovery action founded on such an unlawful inclusion could also be challenged in writ proceedings, and delay, laches, or the availability of an alternative statutory remedy did not bar relief where the demand itself was a nullity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Apr 2010 10:22:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=76617" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (2) TMI 71 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38071</link>
      <description>Dividend is taxable only when it is actually or deemed to be paid, credited, or distributed in an unconditional form under section 16(2) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922; a mere declaration subject to remittance restrictions does not create taxable income where the shareholder has no unconditional right to the amount. On that basis, inclusion of the disputed dividend in income was treated as without jurisdiction. A recovery action founded on such an unlawful inclusion could also be challenged in writ proceedings, and delay, laches, or the availability of an alternative statutory remedy did not bar relief where the demand itself was a nullity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38071</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>