https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757779 The Bombay HC held that notices issued under Section 148 by JAO instead of FAO were invalid due to non-compliance with Section 151A and notification dated 29 March 2022. The court ruled that JAO lacked jurisdiction to issue faceless assessment notices for income escaping assessment, following the precedent in Hexaware Technologies Ltd. The petition was allowed in favor of the assessee, with the impugned notices declared illegal and invalid. en-us Mon, 26 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 02 Sep 2024 08:25:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757779 The Bombay HC held that notices issued under Section 148 by JAO instead of FAO were invalid due to non-compliance with Section 151A and notification dated 29 March 2022. The court ruled that JAO lacked jurisdiction to issue faceless assessment notices for income escaping assessment, following the precedent in Hexaware Technologies Ltd. The petition was allowed in favor of the assessee, with the impugned notices declared illegal and invalid. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 26 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757779