<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 7 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757763</link>
    <description>NCLAT Principal Bench dismissed appeals challenging adjudicating authority&#039;s order rejecting fresh application under Section 94 IBC. Appellant had filed Section 94 application in 2020, which was dismissed in February 2024 without liberty to re-file. Though appellant was later permitted to withdraw another petition with liberty to re-file, the adjudicating authority correctly held that no such liberty was granted in the original dismissal order. Bank opposed citing misuse of interim moratorium preventing recovery proceedings under SARFAESI/RDBFI Act for four years. NCLAT found no error in adjudicating authority&#039;s decision on maintainability of fresh application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2024 08:25:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=766133" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 7 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757763</link>
      <description>NCLAT Principal Bench dismissed appeals challenging adjudicating authority&#039;s order rejecting fresh application under Section 94 IBC. Appellant had filed Section 94 application in 2020, which was dismissed in February 2024 without liberty to re-file. Though appellant was later permitted to withdraw another petition with liberty to re-file, the adjudicating authority correctly held that no such liberty was granted in the original dismissal order. Bank opposed citing misuse of interim moratorium preventing recovery proceedings under SARFAESI/RDBFI Act for four years. NCLAT found no error in adjudicating authority&#039;s decision on maintainability of fresh application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757763</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>