<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 5 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757761</link>
    <description>CESTAT Kolkata held that appellant was liable for service tax on multiple services: advertisement space provision to agencies classified as &quot;Sale of Space or Time for Advertisement&quot;; technical testing services on construction materials classified as &quot;Technical Testing and Analysis Service&quot;; property rental to Metro Railways classified as &quot;Renting of Immovable Property Service&quot;; and construction work for Metro Corporation classified as &quot;Commercial or Industrial Construction Service&quot;. No exemptions were available for these services. However, extended limitation period was set aside as appellant, being a statutory organization, lacked intent to evade tax and department failed to prove suppression of facts. Demand restricted to normal limitation period only, with no penalty imposed. Matter remanded for quantification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2024 08:24:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=766130" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 5 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757761</link>
      <description>CESTAT Kolkata held that appellant was liable for service tax on multiple services: advertisement space provision to agencies classified as &quot;Sale of Space or Time for Advertisement&quot;; technical testing services on construction materials classified as &quot;Technical Testing and Analysis Service&quot;; property rental to Metro Railways classified as &quot;Renting of Immovable Property Service&quot;; and construction work for Metro Corporation classified as &quot;Commercial or Industrial Construction Service&quot;. No exemptions were available for these services. However, extended limitation period was set aside as appellant, being a statutory organization, lacked intent to evade tax and department failed to prove suppression of facts. Demand restricted to normal limitation period only, with no penalty imposed. Matter remanded for quantification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757761</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>