https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457014 A State revisional provision is displaced under Article 254 only to the extent of direct inconsistency with a later Parliamentary law; where the two enactments can operate together, the State law survives in the remaining field. Repeal by implication is not readily inferred, and a Central revision scheme does not automatically render the State provision exhaustive. On that basis, Bihar section 64A was not wholly void or repealed, but inoperative only where it conflicted with the Central provision. The State Government of Bihar therefore retained jurisdiction to revise the appellate order in the present matter. en-us Wed, 04 Nov 1964 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 31 Aug 2024 12:06:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457014 A State revisional provision is displaced under Article 254 only to the extent of direct inconsistency with a later Parliamentary law; where the two enactments can operate together, the State law survives in the remaining field. Repeal by implication is not readily inferred, and a Central revision scheme does not automatically render the State provision exhaustive. On that basis, Bihar section 64A was not wholly void or repealed, but inoperative only where it conflicted with the Central provision. The State Government of Bihar therefore retained jurisdiction to revise the appellate order in the present matter. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 04 Nov 1964 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457014