https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757744 The CESTAT Ahmedabad held that a party engaged in purchasing and reselling land for profit cannot be classified as a Real Estate Agent for service tax purposes. The tribunal relied on precedent from Nilesh T Patel case, where similar land purchase and resale activities to real estate developers were held not to constitute Real Estate Agent services. The department's demand for service tax under the Real Estate Agent category was deemed unsustainable. The impugned order was set aside and the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant. en-us Fri, 30 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 30 Aug 2024 18:13:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757744 The CESTAT Ahmedabad held that a party engaged in purchasing and reselling land for profit cannot be classified as a Real Estate Agent for service tax purposes. The tribunal relied on precedent from Nilesh T Patel case, where similar land purchase and resale activities to real estate developers were held not to constitute Real Estate Agent services. The department's demand for service tax under the Real Estate Agent category was deemed unsustainable. The impugned order was set aside and the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 30 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757744