<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 1428 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757724</link>
    <description>The ITAT Mumbai dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals on multiple grounds. Regarding TP adjustment on bank guarantee, the tribunal followed its own precedent holding no adjustment was warranted despite the transaction being international. For depreciation on plant machinery, the tribunal allowed depreciation where the assessee had possession and capitalized the machinery despite principal ownership. Professional fees for arbitration were held allowable as business expenses. The tribunal also upheld exclusion of ESOP tax payments from book profit computation under Section 115JB, noting such employer payments on behalf of employees don&#039;t constitute income tax under the statutory definition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2024 08:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=766023" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 1428 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757724</link>
      <description>The ITAT Mumbai dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals on multiple grounds. Regarding TP adjustment on bank guarantee, the tribunal followed its own precedent holding no adjustment was warranted despite the transaction being international. For depreciation on plant machinery, the tribunal allowed depreciation where the assessee had possession and capitalized the machinery despite principal ownership. Professional fees for arbitration were held allowable as business expenses. The tribunal also upheld exclusion of ESOP tax payments from book profit computation under Section 115JB, noting such employer payments on behalf of employees don&#039;t constitute income tax under the statutory definition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757724</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>