<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 1410 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757706</link>
    <description>In a PMLA prosecution, regular bail remained subject to the statutory twin conditions under Section 45, and the applicant failed to show that he was not guilty or would not commit an offence while on bail. Prima facie material, including the Supreme Court&#039;s earlier finding in the applicant&#039;s own matter, indicated involvement in money laundering and use of proceeds of crime, so bail was refused. Delay in trial did not justify release because the main cause of non-progress was the non-appearance and non-cooperation of other accused, and parity, custody period, political change, and family circumstances were insufficient to outweigh the seriousness of the allegations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Aug 2024 07:52:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=765990" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 1410 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757706</link>
      <description>In a PMLA prosecution, regular bail remained subject to the statutory twin conditions under Section 45, and the applicant failed to show that he was not guilty or would not commit an offence while on bail. Prima facie material, including the Supreme Court&#039;s earlier finding in the applicant&#039;s own matter, indicated involvement in money laundering and use of proceeds of crime, so bail was refused. Delay in trial did not justify release because the main cause of non-progress was the non-appearance and non-cooperation of other accused, and parity, custody period, political change, and family circumstances were insufficient to outweigh the seriousness of the allegations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757706</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>