<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 1403 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757699</link>
    <description>Pre-deposit for maintainability of an appeal may be satisfied through the Electronic Credit Ledger where the applicable legal position permits it, and a later CBIC circular cannot be applied retrospectively to defeat that mode of payment. The Tribunal had treated the circular as prospective because it took effect only on 28 October 2022, while the appeal had been filed earlier. The Bombay HC accepted that approach, upheld the validity of the electronic ledger payment, and held that the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Aug 2024 07:52:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=765978" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 1403 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757699</link>
      <description>Pre-deposit for maintainability of an appeal may be satisfied through the Electronic Credit Ledger where the applicable legal position permits it, and a later CBIC circular cannot be applied retrospectively to defeat that mode of payment. The Tribunal had treated the circular as prospective because it took effect only on 28 October 2022, while the appeal had been filed earlier. The Bombay HC accepted that approach, upheld the validity of the electronic ledger payment, and held that the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757699</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>