<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 1040 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456997</link>
    <description>The Bombay HC dismissed an appeal challenging the Tribunal&#039;s ruling, which determined no mala fide intent in underpayment of duty, thereby rendering Section 11D of the Central Excise Act, 1944 inapplicable. The HC concluded that no substantial question of law was present and expedited the certified copy of the order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2024 14:20:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=765933" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 1040 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456997</link>
      <description>The Bombay HC dismissed an appeal challenging the Tribunal&#039;s ruling, which determined no mala fide intent in underpayment of duty, thereby rendering Section 11D of the Central Excise Act, 1944 inapplicable. The HC concluded that no substantial question of law was present and expedited the certified copy of the order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456997</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>