<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (12) TMI 14 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38040</link>
    <description>For estate duty, the decisive enquiry is whether death causes a change in beneficial enjoyment or beneficial interest in the property. The Court held that the family&#039;s collective right to have trust income applied for maintenance and household purposes was not a quantifiable individual interest. On the widow&#039;s death, that group enjoyment ended and the sons became entitled to the residuary estate absolutely, so the whole residuary estate passed on death within section 5 of the Estate Duty Act, 1953. The Court also held that the residuary estate was not aggregable with the remaining estate under section 34(3) because the widow never had a definable beneficial interest in it.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 17:01:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=76586" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (12) TMI 14 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38040</link>
      <description>For estate duty, the decisive enquiry is whether death causes a change in beneficial enjoyment or beneficial interest in the property. The Court held that the family&#039;s collective right to have trust income applied for maintenance and household purposes was not a quantifiable individual interest. On the widow&#039;s death, that group enjoyment ended and the sons became entitled to the residuary estate absolutely, so the whole residuary estate passed on death within section 5 of the Estate Duty Act, 1953. The Court also held that the residuary estate was not aggregable with the remaining estate under section 34(3) because the widow never had a definable beneficial interest in it.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38040</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>