<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 1351 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757647</link>
    <description>CESTAT Mumbai held that HDPE Regrind goods were wrongly confiscated by customs authorities. The tribunal found that CRCL JNCH laboratory&#039;s test report, based only on visual examination, lacked legal basis as the laboratory had publicly notified its inability to test certain goods. Two other laboratories&#039; reports and BIS standards confirmed the imported goods did not qualify as plastic waste/scrap under CTH 3901 2000, thus not requiring import license under DGFT policy. The Commissioner&#039;s order upholding confiscation, redemption fine, and penalty was set aside, with appeal allowed in appellants&#039; favor.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2024 13:09:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=765846" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 1351 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757647</link>
      <description>CESTAT Mumbai held that HDPE Regrind goods were wrongly confiscated by customs authorities. The tribunal found that CRCL JNCH laboratory&#039;s test report, based only on visual examination, lacked legal basis as the laboratory had publicly notified its inability to test certain goods. Two other laboratories&#039; reports and BIS standards confirmed the imported goods did not qualify as plastic waste/scrap under CTH 3901 2000, thus not requiring import license under DGFT policy. The Commissioner&#039;s order upholding confiscation, redemption fine, and penalty was set aside, with appeal allowed in appellants&#039; favor.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757647</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>