https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757646 CESTAT Mumbai allowed the appeal against CB license suspension. The tribunal found violation of Regulation 10(d) of CBLR 2018 for failure to file correct bills of entry and advise importers properly, but rejected charges under Regulation 10(e) as unsustainable due to lack of factual basis. While acknowledging slight procedural delays, the tribunal found no inordinate delay in proceedings. The license revocation and security deposit forfeiture were set aside, but a penalty of Rs.10,000 was imposed for failure to exercise due diligence under Regulation 10(d). en-us Mon, 26 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 29 Aug 2024 17:50:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757646 CESTAT Mumbai allowed the appeal against CB license suspension. The tribunal found violation of Regulation 10(d) of CBLR 2018 for failure to file correct bills of entry and advise importers properly, but rejected charges under Regulation 10(e) as unsustainable due to lack of factual basis. While acknowledging slight procedural delays, the tribunal found no inordinate delay in proceedings. The license revocation and security deposit forfeiture were set aside, but a penalty of Rs.10,000 was imposed for failure to exercise due diligence under Regulation 10(d). Case-Laws Customs Mon, 26 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757646