<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Appellate Tribunal Upholds RP&#039;s Authority in Section 95 Proceedings; Affirms Natural Justice Principles Apply.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=80823</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal examined the objections raised by the Personal Guarantors regarding the violation of principles of natural justice and the locus standi of the Resolution Professional (RP) to file the application. The Tribunal held that while principles of natural justice are applicable in proceedings u/s 95, the Supreme Court has ruled that the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s role cannot be held applicable at the stage of Section 97(5), i.e., when the RP has been appointed. The Appellants failed to implead the RP in their appeal challenging the RP&#039;s appointment, and cannot now claim that the RP lacks locus standi. The RP cannot be precluded from submitting its report as per the Supreme Court&#039;s judgment, and the Adjudicating Authority must c.....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2024 08:37:38 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2024 08:37:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=765833" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Appellate Tribunal Upholds RP&#039;s Authority in Section 95 Proceedings; Affirms Natural Justice Principles Apply.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=80823</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal examined the objections raised by the Personal Guarantors regarding the violation of principles of natural justice and the locus standi of the Resolution Professional (RP) to file the application. The Tribunal held that while principles of natural justice are applicable in proceedings u/s 95, the Supreme Court has ruled that the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s role cannot be held applicable at the stage of Section 97(5), i.e., when the RP has been appointed. The Appellants failed to implead the RP in their appeal challenging the RP&#039;s appointment, and cannot now claim that the RP lacks locus standi. The RP cannot be precluded from submitting its report as per the Supreme Court&#039;s judgment, and the Adjudicating Authority must c.....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2024 08:37:38 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=80823</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>