https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757637 Delhi HC upheld seizure orders under FEMA, finding that authorities had examined relevant material and formed reasonable belief before effecting seizures. The court held that constitutional courts should not interdict investigations or probe evidentiary value during judicial review, but only assess whether objective material existed before seizure. Disputed questions regarding capital account transactions, business operations, and alleged violations were deemed factual matters requiring evidence evaluation beyond writ jurisdiction scope. The court refused to decide merits, relegating appellant to adjudicating authority proceedings where substantial hearings were already underway. en-us Thu, 22 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 30 Aug 2024 08:37:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757637 Delhi HC upheld seizure orders under FEMA, finding that authorities had examined relevant material and formed reasonable belief before effecting seizures. The court held that constitutional courts should not interdict investigations or probe evidentiary value during judicial review, but only assess whether objective material existed before seizure. Disputed questions regarding capital account transactions, business operations, and alleged violations were deemed factual matters requiring evidence evaluation beyond writ jurisdiction scope. The court refused to decide merits, relegating appellant to adjudicating authority proceedings where substantial hearings were already underway. Case-Laws FEMA Thu, 22 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757637