<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 1323 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757619</link>
    <description>Appellate interference under Section 125 of the Electricity Act is confined to substantial questions of law, so factual findings on delay, based on materials such as land conversion and evacuation approvals, will not justify reopening unless they are illegal, unreasonable, or perverse. A force majeure clause in a power purchase agreement must be read according to its text and structure, including the requirement that non-obtaining of approvals is not due to the party&#039;s own negligence or omission. On the facts discussed, the delay was attributed to governmental processing, the project was commissioned within the extended period, and the contractual basis for tariff reduction and liquidated damages did not survive.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2024 18:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=765801" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 1323 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757619</link>
      <description>Appellate interference under Section 125 of the Electricity Act is confined to substantial questions of law, so factual findings on delay, based on materials such as land conversion and evacuation approvals, will not justify reopening unless they are illegal, unreasonable, or perverse. A force majeure clause in a power purchase agreement must be read according to its text and structure, including the requirement that non-obtaining of approvals is not due to the party&#039;s own negligence or omission. On the facts discussed, the delay was attributed to governmental processing, the project was commissioned within the extended period, and the contractual basis for tariff reduction and liquidated damages did not survive.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757619</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>