<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (7) TMI 21 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38029</link>
    <description>Interest on Government securities held as stock-in-trade is chargeable under the specific head &quot;interest on securities&quot; and cannot be treated as business income merely because the securities are trading assets. For a registered firm under the 1922 Act, a partner&#039;s share is taken as share of partnership profits after apportionment of the firm&#039;s total income, and the later head-wise apportionment rule in section 67(2) of the 1961 Act was not retrospective. The partner&#039;s share income was therefore not required to be split under different heads on the firm&#039;s assessment pattern, and the share income, including the component linked to securities interest, was treated as business income in the partner&#039;s hands for earned income relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 16:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=76575" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (7) TMI 21 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38029</link>
      <description>Interest on Government securities held as stock-in-trade is chargeable under the specific head &quot;interest on securities&quot; and cannot be treated as business income merely because the securities are trading assets. For a registered firm under the 1922 Act, a partner&#039;s share is taken as share of partnership profits after apportionment of the firm&#039;s total income, and the later head-wise apportionment rule in section 67(2) of the 1961 Act was not retrospective. The partner&#039;s share income was therefore not required to be split under different heads on the firm&#039;s assessment pattern, and the share income, including the component linked to securities interest, was treated as business income in the partner&#039;s hands for earned income relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38029</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>