<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 1312 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757608</link>
    <description>HC found procedural irregularities in tax assessment proceedings. Despite email notices, physical notices were undelivered. The court set aside the tax demand, remanded the matter for fresh adjudication, and granted the petitioner three weeks to respond to show cause notices. The petitioner was required to deposit 10% of disputed tax before filing objections.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 May 2025 11:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=765723" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 1312 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757608</link>
      <description>HC found procedural irregularities in tax assessment proceedings. Despite email notices, physical notices were undelivered. The court set aside the tax demand, remanded the matter for fresh adjudication, and granted the petitioner three weeks to respond to show cause notices. The petitioner was required to deposit 10% of disputed tax before filing objections.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757608</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>