<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 1306 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757602</link>
    <description>No challenge to the validity of Section 72(c) of the Black Money Act was raised in the criminal petition, and the Court noted the High Court&#039;s observation that the provision allegedly conflicted with Article 20 of the Constitution. On the prayer for interim relief, notice was issued and the impugned portion was ordered to remain stayed pending further consideration. The order did not render any final adjudication on the constitutional validity of Section 72(c).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2024 08:20:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=765712" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 1306 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757602</link>
      <description>No challenge to the validity of Section 72(c) of the Black Money Act was raised in the criminal petition, and the Court noted the High Court&#039;s observation that the provision allegedly conflicted with Article 20 of the Constitution. On the prayer for interim relief, notice was issued and the impugned portion was ordered to remain stayed pending further consideration. The order did not render any final adjudication on the constitutional validity of Section 72(c).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757602</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>