<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 1301 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757597</link>
    <description>Gujarat HC remanded the matter to the Tribunal to determine whether land at Motera qualifies as agricultural land under section 2(14) of the Act for exemption under section 54B. The Tribunal had failed to consider the nature of the land in question when deciding if it falls within the definition of capital asset. The court directed the Tribunal to specifically examine whether the transferred land meets the agricultural land criteria as defined in the statutory provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2024 11:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=765705" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 1301 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757597</link>
      <description>Gujarat HC remanded the matter to the Tribunal to determine whether land at Motera qualifies as agricultural land under section 2(14) of the Act for exemption under section 54B. The Tribunal had failed to consider the nature of the land in question when deciding if it falls within the definition of capital asset. The court directed the Tribunal to specifically examine whether the transferred land meets the agricultural land criteria as defined in the statutory provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757597</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>