<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (7) TMI 20 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38024</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to classify the expenditure as capital and allow depreciation, favoring the assessee. The Court emphasized the importance of clear findings of fact by the Tribunal and reiterated the criteria for claiming depreciation on assets. Both parties agreed on the relevant facts, leading the Court to find it unnecessary to call for a fresh statement of the case. The reference was disposed of in favor of the assessee, with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2015 10:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=76570" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (7) TMI 20 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38024</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to classify the expenditure as capital and allow depreciation, favoring the assessee. The Court emphasized the importance of clear findings of fact by the Tribunal and reiterated the criteria for claiming depreciation on assets. Both parties agreed on the relevant facts, leading the Court to find it unnecessary to call for a fresh statement of the case. The reference was disposed of in favor of the assessee, with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38024</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>