<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 1287 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757583</link>
    <description>The SC dismissed the Review Petition, stating it was unsuitable as the limitation issue was not raised in the original Writ Petitions. The Court held that the Petitioners should address the limitation aspect in an appeal under Section 129-A of the Customs Act, as directed by the prior order. No costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2024 08:19:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=765684" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 1287 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757583</link>
      <description>The SC dismissed the Review Petition, stating it was unsuitable as the limitation issue was not raised in the original Writ Petitions. The Court held that the Petitioners should address the limitation aspect in an appeal under Section 129-A of the Customs Act, as directed by the prior order. No costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757583</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>