<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (1) TMI 48 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38021</link>
    <description>Profits and losses arising under the same head of income, namely business income, were treated as outside the scope of set-off under section 24(1) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922. The exemption in section 14(2)(c) was construed in its plain and wide terms to cover income accruing within an Indian State, and the proviso to section 24(1) could not be used to narrow that exemption. On that construction, the loss in Jaipur State was not deducted from profits arising in other Indian States, and the full profit remained exempt.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 15:45:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=76567" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (1) TMI 48 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38021</link>
      <description>Profits and losses arising under the same head of income, namely business income, were treated as outside the scope of set-off under section 24(1) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922. The exemption in section 14(2)(c) was construed in its plain and wide terms to cover income accruing within an Indian State, and the proviso to section 24(1) could not be used to narrow that exemption. On that construction, the loss in Jaipur State was not deducted from profits arising in other Indian States, and the full profit remained exempt.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38021</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>