https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757565 Bail under Section 439(1) CrPC in a serious economic offence must be granted only after a judicious assessment of the accusation, the accused's role, the gravity of the offence, and the risk of tampering with evidence or influencing witnesses. Appellate interference is justified where the bail order is illegal, perverse, or based on incomplete or irrelevant consideration of the record. On the stated facts, investigation material including the charge-sheet and forensic audit indicated a prima facie role in withdrawal and deployment of funds, while the High Court's grant of bail was based on an insufficient appreciation of the record and lacked adequate safeguards, rendering the order unsustainable. en-us Wed, 28 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 29 Aug 2024 08:18:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757565 Bail under Section 439(1) CrPC in a serious economic offence must be granted only after a judicious assessment of the accusation, the accused's role, the gravity of the offence, and the risk of tampering with evidence or influencing witnesses. Appellate interference is justified where the bail order is illegal, perverse, or based on incomplete or irrelevant consideration of the record. On the stated facts, investigation material including the charge-sheet and forensic audit indicated a prima facie role in withdrawal and deployment of funds, while the High Court's grant of bail was based on an insufficient appreciation of the record and lacked adequate safeguards, rendering the order unsustainable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 28 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757565