https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757564 A recognised school could not invoke the surplus-staff absorption rule after closure without prior approval of the Director, because the governing education scheme required lawful closure with full justification and prior approval; the school's closure after demolition of part of the building did not satisfy that condition, so liability for re-employment and salaries could not be shifted to the municipal authority. The municipal authority's limitation objection to reimbursement was also rejected, since reimbursement had earlier been left open and the authority had been directed to pay the staff with liberty to recover from the managing committee. The remaining dues, including interest, therefore remained payable, while the authority retained the right to seek recovery from the committee. en-us Wed, 28 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 29 Aug 2024 08:18:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757564 A recognised school could not invoke the surplus-staff absorption rule after closure without prior approval of the Director, because the governing education scheme required lawful closure with full justification and prior approval; the school's closure after demolition of part of the building did not satisfy that condition, so liability for re-employment and salaries could not be shifted to the municipal authority. The municipal authority's limitation objection to reimbursement was also rejected, since reimbursement had earlier been left open and the authority had been directed to pay the staff with liberty to recover from the managing committee. The remaining dues, including interest, therefore remained payable, while the authority retained the right to seek recovery from the committee. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 28 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757564