<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 2146 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456955</link>
    <description>Samples drawn from finished goods and sent for testing within the factory were not treated as excisable removals because they were not cleared for sale and could not be regarded as complete until testing was finished. Samples destroyed during the testing process were therefore not liable to excise duty, and the duty demand was held unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2024 19:33:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=765649" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 2146 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456955</link>
      <description>Samples drawn from finished goods and sent for testing within the factory were not treated as excisable removals because they were not cleared for sale and could not be regarded as complete until testing was finished. Samples destroyed during the testing process were therefore not liable to excise duty, and the duty demand was held unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456955</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>