<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (2) TMI 1332 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456957</link>
    <description>Belated employees&#039; contribution to provident fund and ESIC was treated as disallowable, and the adjustment was held permissible while processing the return under section 143(1). The Tribunal noted that the legal position on delayed employee contributions had already been settled against the assessee, and the ex parte appeal failed. The disallowance was therefore upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2024 19:33:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=765647" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (2) TMI 1332 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456957</link>
      <description>Belated employees&#039; contribution to provident fund and ESIC was treated as disallowable, and the adjustment was held permissible while processing the return under section 143(1). The Tribunal noted that the legal position on delayed employee contributions had already been settled against the assessee, and the ex parte appeal failed. The disallowance was therefore upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456957</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>