https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456962 Conviction under Section 489C IPC for possession of counterfeit currency was upheld because the recovery evidence of the raiding party was consistent, the hostile witnesses did not discredit the seizure and expert report, and minor discrepancies did not affect the prosecution case. Conviction under Section 489B IPC was set aside because trafficking with knowledge of counterfeit currency had not been specifically charged, and sustaining that basis at the appellate stage would cause prejudice and failure of justice. The Section 313 CrPC examination was found adequate in substance and no prejudice was shown. en-us Fri, 03 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 28 Aug 2024 19:33:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456962 Conviction under Section 489C IPC for possession of counterfeit currency was upheld because the recovery evidence of the raiding party was consistent, the hostile witnesses did not discredit the seizure and expert report, and minor discrepancies did not affect the prosecution case. Conviction under Section 489B IPC was set aside because trafficking with knowledge of counterfeit currency had not been specifically charged, and sustaining that basis at the appellate stage would cause prejudice and failure of justice. The Section 313 CrPC examination was found adequate in substance and no prejudice was shown. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 03 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456962