<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 1836 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456938</link>
    <description>Concealed possession and carriage of a sizeable quantity of counterfeit currency notes may fall within Section 489-B of the Indian Penal Code, not merely Section 489-C, where the surrounding circumstances show active trafficking and knowledge of the notes&#039; counterfeit character. The expression &quot;or otherwise traffics in&quot; was read broadly to cover transportation of forged notes, and the accused&#039;s failure to offer a satisfactory explanation for possession supported the statutory inference. On that basis, the conviction under Sections 489-B and 489-C read with Section 34 was sustained, and the sentence was also affirmed because no legal infirmity or disproportionality was shown.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2024 09:08:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=765571" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 1836 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456938</link>
      <description>Concealed possession and carriage of a sizeable quantity of counterfeit currency notes may fall within Section 489-B of the Indian Penal Code, not merely Section 489-C, where the surrounding circumstances show active trafficking and knowledge of the notes&#039; counterfeit character. The expression &quot;or otherwise traffics in&quot; was read broadly to cover transportation of forged notes, and the accused&#039;s failure to offer a satisfactory explanation for possession supported the statutory inference. On that basis, the conviction under Sections 489-B and 489-C read with Section 34 was sustained, and the sentence was also affirmed because no legal infirmity or disproportionality was shown.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456938</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>