<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 1402 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456939</link>
    <description>Uncorroborated statements recorded under customs inquiry powers cannot alone establish trafficking or use of counterfeit currency, where no independent evidence proves sale, purchase, receipt, source, movement, or other trafficking conduct. The conviction for trafficking or using counterfeit currency was therefore set aside. Consistent raiding and public-witness evidence established recovery of counterfeit notes from the accused, while expert evidence confirmed their counterfeit nature and cross-examination did not displace the seizure. Proved possession beyond reasonable doubt satisfied the possession offence, so the conviction and sentence for possession of counterfeit currency were maintained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2024 09:08:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=765570" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 1402 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456939</link>
      <description>Uncorroborated statements recorded under customs inquiry powers cannot alone establish trafficking or use of counterfeit currency, where no independent evidence proves sale, purchase, receipt, source, movement, or other trafficking conduct. The conviction for trafficking or using counterfeit currency was therefore set aside. Consistent raiding and public-witness evidence established recovery of counterfeit notes from the accused, while expert evidence confirmed their counterfeit nature and cross-examination did not displace the seizure. Proved possession beyond reasonable doubt satisfied the possession offence, so the conviction and sentence for possession of counterfeit currency were maintained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456939</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>