<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 1263 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757559</link>
    <description>An ex parte GST order passed without affording the petitioner a hearing was set aside for breach of natural justice. By consent, the matter was remitted to the authority for fresh consideration de novo, with a direction to grant a hearing and pass a reasoned order within eight weeks. The Court further recorded that limitation would not arise in the fresh exercise, so the authority was to decide the matter on merits after hearing the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 May 2025 18:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=765554" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 1263 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757559</link>
      <description>An ex parte GST order passed without affording the petitioner a hearing was set aside for breach of natural justice. By consent, the matter was remitted to the authority for fresh consideration de novo, with a direction to grant a hearing and pass a reasoned order within eight weeks. The Court further recorded that limitation would not arise in the fresh exercise, so the authority was to decide the matter on merits after hearing the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757559</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>